Menu
testing
Blog / Commentary / Knots Untied / Matthew / Matthew / Prophecy in the Crucible / Rapture, Error

One Taken, One Left

In Matthew 24:40-41 we read, “Two men will be in the field: one will be taken and the other will be left. Two women will be grinding at the mill: one will be taken and the other left.” A similar statement is found in Luke 17:34-36. Most prophecy teachers insist that this separation is the rapture. After all, they portray a scene in which men and women will be going about their business and suddenly the godly will vanish.  I understand why they make this connection. At first glance it looks like the rapture.  But the context and details of the passage suggest that “one taken and one left” is not a reference to the rapture but an event that shall occur at the second coming.

First of all, in both the preceding context (Matthew 24) and the following context (Matthew 25), the coming of the Son of man refers to the day the Lord descends to earth in judgment. Matthew 24:29-31 locates this coming after the time of great tribulation. Matthew 25:31-46 associates this coming with the judgment of the sheep and goats.  Furthermore, in the immediate context we see that “one taken, and the other left” in verse 40 occurs in connection with the coming of the Son of man in Matt. 24:36-39. Notice that verse 40 starts with “then.” Now it seems like dubious exegesis to me to insist that this particular reference of the coming of the Son of man refers to the rapture though every other instance in the preceding and following context refers to the coming of the Lord in judgment. And if this coming of the Son of man is the second coming, then those who are taken must be the ungodly, for without exception the second coming passages portray the separation being accomplished by removing the ungodly and leaving the godly. The order is exactly the opposite of the rapture.

Secondly, this event takes fifty percent and leaves fifty percent. This can’t be the rapture. Five percent being taken would be an extremely optimistic estimate for the rapture. And the actual figure is most likely closer to one percent. God is not sloppy in his math. The 144,000 will be exactly 144,000—exactly 12,000 from each of exactly 12 tribes. The seventy years of captivity was exactly seventy years, not sixty-eight or seventy-two. The sixty-nine weeks of years from the command to rebuild Jerusalem was exactly 483 years from its utterance until the triumphant entry of Messiah the prince. The angels loosed by the sixth trumpet were set for an hour, day, month, and year. They won’t come one hour early or one hour late. And so the fifty percent will be exactly fifty percent, not twenty or ten or five or one.

Thirdly, this event does not take the taken to a wonderful place but to an awful place—”where there is a corpse, there the eagles gather” (Luke 17:37). What do corpses and carrion eating birds have to do with the rapture, where the church meets the Lord in the air and is transported to the Father’s house in heaven? Nothing! At what prophetic event do we find corpses and carrion eating birds? Armageddon. For those who care more about exegetical integrity than they do multiplying rapture passages, it is obvious that “one taken, the other left” is not a reference to the rapture but Armageddon.

So what event occurs at the time of Armageddon that involves a fifty percent division? The sack of Jerusalem on the day of the Lord that we read about in Zechariah 14:1-2. The invading army of the antichrist will take the ungodly half captive, presumably placing them in an internment camp in Armageddon where they will perish with the armies of the Gentile nations. The godly half will be left in Jerusalem to welcome the arrival of their Lord a few hours later.

The “one taken and one left” passages are a classic example of the problems we face when we interpret passages based on superficial observations rather than a full-orbed, robust exegesis.  Not only do we misunderstand the passage itself, but we lose the light that it could shed on other passages and subjects, and we grow accustomed to sloppy principles of interpretation that promote minor errors in the camp of truth.

Eyes wide open, brain engaged, heart on fire.

Lee W. Brainard

6 Comments

  • Donna Hinson
    January 15, 2020 at 5:41 pm

    Wow another teaching that was wrongly interpreted, like everyone else I too thought this was the rapture, but one verse has me stumped where it says 2 men in bed one taken one left behind, I wondered on that verse about the 2 men could they have been gay and 1 recently got saved and the other not? Not sure where’s it at but around the same area as the above teaching in the Bible , thank you for what you do, will be following and learning the truth thru you cos my husband Eddie who studied at Instate in Fla before he moved here in SC due his having CML Leukemia told me to discern what I read cos it’s has errors and people misinterpretate scripture not meaning too and some mean to change it , I know I can learn the real truth of God’s Word thru you
    Thank you !!

    Reply
    • Lee Brainard
      January 23, 2020 at 5:32 pm

      Hi Donna. Sorry I missed this. Somehow it went into trash, but I always search trash before I empty it. Thanks for writing! I take “men” in the “two men in bed” passage as references to humans not males. This is the sense we see in Genesis, “God created man. Male and female created he him.” Both Greek and Hebrew handle “man” this way. The whole world used to until the modern moral revolution which is trying to rewrite history, morality, language, etc. I appreciate your appreciation! My goal is to be faithful to the word of God. I learn much from others, but I reject much too. In the bonds of the faith. Lee.

      Reply
  • Sharon Benjamin
    February 17, 2022 at 3:05 pm

    Hello, I see you mentioned Revelation 9:15 verse when the angels are appointed to an hour, a day, a month, etc. I hear preachers or speakers say when the last person is saved, Jesus will come and get us, I always think about this verse, they never mention it. God has a set time for all this, the rapture, the tribulation to start, everything. He is not waiting for that last person to be saved but for the set, preappoiinted time.

    Reply
    • Lee Brainard
      March 29, 2022 at 2:49 am

      Hi Sharon, 
      Sorry for the delayed response. Your question got hung up in spam.  I too think the coming of the Lord is time based, not number based. God has set the second coming to the minute. The rapture is linked to this, seven years plus a short window of unknown length. We will know the rapture is close when we see the stage being set for the tribulation. 
      Lee

      Reply
  • Paula Stinson
    May 7, 2022 at 3:06 pm

    Lee,
    I have also always believed that this “taking away” did not refer to the rapture, but I also have difficulty reconciling it with the following passages:
    Dan_7:21 I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;
    Rev_13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    Could it mean that many saints will be taken captive, possibly to be used as slaves? Why else would “saints” be working side by side with bearers of the mark right before the second coming?

    Reply
    • Lee Brainard
      May 25, 2022 at 5:42 pm

      My apologies for the delayed response. I was engaged in eighteen hour days on two book projects and and preparing for two conferences.

      The former passage merely means that the antichrist will execute and persecute the saints. While he might use some as slaves, there is nothing in the Bible I can think of that requires us to believe that. The latter implies that believers who refuse the mark will be reduced to foraging, scavenging, dumpster diving, handouts, and the like.

      Reply

Leave a Reply